It is also possible to set just one password, which then cannot be changed. On top of this, SparkleShare’s client encryption is not optimal, as file names on the server cannot be encrypted. For this reason, it is recommended to use another software for synchronizing personal music and image files. When it comes to file synchronization, SparkleShare users must, however, put up with certain restrictions. To make the files available on your own local server, both Git and the encryption process SSH are necessary. This allows for the tracking of all amendments and modifications, something which is particularly useful for projects with many employees working on them. One big upside is the use of the version control system Git. The complex system is mostly used by Linux system administrators and is a viable alternative to ownCloud, if users are aware that fundamental technical knowledge is a basic requirement. The open source software SparkleShare is primarily for advanced users. The major downside to SpiderOak is the slow upload speed, especially when it comes to uploading an entire repository. This means that synchronizations can be configured, which can encompass the desired number of secured folders. To synchronize folders on multiple computers, protection for the relevant structure should be established on all computers. As soon as the folder structure is secured, it will become part of the SpiderOak clustering file system and is visible to all other nodes. Appropriate adjustments can be made, which means that a desired number of folder structures can be saved on the appropriate computer. Even so, with SpiderOak the likelihood is that you will have a higher level of security than, for example, with Dropbox.Īdditionally, SpiderOak is also much more flexible than Dropbox. What this means is that SpiderOak users must blindly trust the host that their clients are safely and reliably encrypted end to end, without making a backdoor key available for uploaded packages. Despite the release of a series of open source software packages for professional encryption, SpiderOak itself is in fact closed source. Among users, the host has a solid reputation, and has also been given a thumbs up by Edward Snowden. SpiderOak is probably the best-known Dropbox alternative that supports end-to-end encryption. But if you do want to get involved with the open source alternatives to ownCloud, then you won’t regret the effort involved here. If you’ve gotten used to the simple structure of ownCloud and wish for something similar, then it will be more than likely that Syncthing is too big a change. This shows that Syncthing may not be suitable for Linux users.ĭuring the initialization it becomes clear that Syncthing is a service for more advanced users. Another possible downside is that installing on Ubuntu can lead to difficulties with regards to synchronization. One of the software’s disadvantages is that it has no integrated file monitoring system, meaning that any changes cause the entire repository to be scanned through – something that can significantly weaken performance. Syncthing, with its appealing web interface, is a good solution with regards to peer-to-peer file synchronization. The ambitious project is constantly being further developed, but this does not take away from the fact that the current software also runs very well. Syncthing is an open source service from Resilio Sync, previously known as BitTorrent Sync. While the Community Edition is available for free, subscribers of the Professional Edition gain access to features that enhance security and administration. The server can be run over Windows, Linux, or Raspberry Pi. Seafile is available for macOS, Windows, and Linux users, as well as for iOS and Android. A high level of reliability and speedy synchronization add to the appealing nature of the program. This host offers a good range of services when it comes to file administration and user collaboration both a commenting and messaging function, as well as file versioning, are the aspects of Seafile that make it particularly attractive for team projects. This means there are several functions not offered, e.g., synchronization services like CalDAV or CardDAV. This means that unlike ownCloud, there is no overall solution for all cloud requirements. All the same, with Seafile the focus is primarily on file sharing and collaboration. Installing the software is relatively easy and in terms of functions it certainly matches up to ownCloud. Seafile also supports the option of end-to-end client encryption. Seen in many ways as a type of Dropbox clone, both the server and the client are based on an open source code. As one of the most prominent ownCloud Alternatives, Seafile is a favorite amongst users who particularly value open source.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |